Skip to main content

Justice Surya Kant Inspires Law Graduates: “Embrace Uncertainty and Ask What Makes You Happy”

Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant delivered a stirring convocation address at Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University (DSNLU), Visakhapatnam, on
September 5, 2025, urging fresh law graduates to embrace uncertainty, explore diverse opportunities, and pursue authentic self-discovery. Speaking at the combined convocation ceremony for the 8th through 12th batches, he reminded graduates that the most transformative question they can ask themselves is: “What truly makes me happy?”

Breaking the Myth of Linear Career Paths

Justice Kant challenged the entrenched belief that young professionals must commit to a single career track early in life.

“You may have felt the pressure to choose a single, specific path and stick to it for the rest of your lives. This is a bit of a fib,” he said, noting that passions and interests evolve with time.

He stressed that few lawyers discover their calling overnight. Instead, the journey is marked by trial, error, and growth. Many, he said, are drawn to unexpected pursuits by a single lecture, a senior’s advice, or a fleeting moment of inspiration. “The world convinces us we must have all the answers, yet the wisest among us know that the journey of self-discovery is lifelong.”

The Transformative Power of Legal Education

Highlighting the adaptability of legal training, Justice Kant described law as uniquely “permeable.”

“Some of you may discover your passion in advocacy, some in corporate offices, others in teaching, public service, or something entirely unexpected. The magic of law is its permeability—its ability to let you reinvent yourself, to switch lanes, to start over.”

He reminded graduates that legal education offers not just the power to shape society, but also the power to reshape themselves. “Allow yourself the freedom to wonder, to wander, and, occasionally, to start anew,” he advised.

Lessons from Uncertainty: Justice Kant’s Personal Journey

Justice Kant shared two pivotal experiences that illustrated how uncertainty can open doors to growth.

·        Turning Down Judicial Services: Early in his career, after clearing the written exam for judicial services, a High Court judge—who had watched him argue a case—advised him not to join the judiciary, noting his promise as an advocate. Despite anxiety and doubt, he chose to withdraw from the interview.

·        Pursuing a Master’s Degree as a Judge: Years later, while serving as a High Court judge, he grappled with the decision to pursue higher studies. Balancing academic rigor with judicial duties felt daunting, yet he embraced the challenge.

“It was precisely these moments of self-doubt and trepidation that paved the way for growth,” he reflected.

The Importance of Relationships and Community

Justice Kant also emphasized the role of family, friendships, and community in sustaining a fulfilling career.

“Too often, legal professionals put off time with family, delay friendships, and postpone self-care, thinking their work must always come first. However, the very moments you cherish most will be those spent among loved ones, in quiet support and playful camaraderie.”

Using the metaphor of a Grand Prix, he likened family and friends to a “pit crew” that sustains lawyers through challenges. “The laughter, comfort, and love waiting for you after a tough day in court gives you the strength to face whatever comes next. Never underestimate the value of that pit stop.”

Practical Guidance for Young Lawyers

Justice Kant’s address combined inspiration with pragmatic wisdom. He urged graduates to:

·        Stay open-minded and resilient.

·        Invest energy in discovering new pursuits.

·        Be bold enough to try, fail, pivot, and succeed on their own terms.

What matters most, he said, is not the rigidity of one’s career destination, but the authenticity of the pursuit. “Happiness will meet you on roads you may not yet have mapped.”

Convocation Highlights

The DSNLU convocation celebrated the academic success of five graduating batches. Supreme Court Justices JK Maheshwari and P. Sri Narasimha graced the event alongside DSNLU Chancellor and Andhra Pradesh High Court Chief Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur. Degrees were conferred, and toppers were awarded gold and silver medals for academic excellence.

A Broader Context

Justice Kant’s message resonates at a time when young lawyers face shifting expectations in the profession. Traditional career structures are giving way to new opportunities in corporate law, policy, technology, and dispute resolution. His emphasis on flexibility, self-discovery, and community reflects the realities of modern legal practice.

For the graduates of DSNLU, his words served not just as a farewell to student life but as a blueprint for navigating the complexities of legal careers—and life itself—with courage, adaptability, and authenticity.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mandatory Injunction Not Automatic: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Relief Under Section 39 of Specific Relief Act

In a significant clarification on the scope of mandatory injunctions, the Supreme Court in Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority & Ors. v. Nirmala Devi has held that the grant of a mandatory injunction under Section 39 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 , is not a matter of right but one of judicial discretion , to be exercised only when a legally enforceable obligation has been clearly breached . ⚖️ Breach Must Be Specific and Proven The Court emphasized that a mandatory injunction , which compels a party to perform a specific act, can be granted only when there is a demonstrable breach of an obligation that is legally binding . "The breach of obligation and performance and compulsion to perform certain acts in relation to such obligation must be specifically established before a mandatory injunction can be granted," the Bench observed. This reinforces that the courts must be satisfied not just about the existence of a duty or obligation, but also th...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Judicial Orders Meet Dishonesty: The Supreme Court's Critical Distinction on Disciplinary Action Against Judges

In a significant observation that challenges long-established judicial doctrine, the Supreme Court of India has articulated a nuanced position on the liability of judges for their judicial orders. While hearing a writ petition filed by a District Judge from Madhya Pradesh who challenged his suspension by the High Court, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant raised a pivotal question: if a judicial order is passed based on dishonest or extraneous considerations rather than mere judicial error , why cannot disciplinary action be initiated? This observation marks an important evolution in the jurisprudence surrounding judicial immunity and disciplinary responsibility. ​ The Case: Factual Background The Supreme Court bench, comprising CJI Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice Vipul Pancholi, examined the suspension of the District Judge immediately before his retirement. Senior Advocate Vipin Sanghi, representing the petitioner, contended that his client possessed an exemplary...
Post a Comment
Read more

Supreme Court Reaffirms "Fraud Unravels Everything" Principle in Landmark Vishnu Vardhan Case

Overview The Supreme Court of India in Vishnu Vardhan @ Vishnu Pradhan vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. made a definitive pronouncement on the relationship between fraud and the doctrine of merger. The three-judge bench comprising Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta, and Ujjal Bhuyan held that if a High Court decision upheld by the Supreme Court was obtained through fraud, an aggrieved party may file a civil appeal against the High Court's order rather than seeking review of the Supreme Court's judgment . Legal Context and Background The dispute centered around a parcel of land in Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, jointly purchased in 1997 by three individuals: Vishnu Vardhan (appellant), Reddy Veeranna, and T. Sudhakar . The land was subsequently acquired by the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) in 2005, forming part of Sector 18, NOIDA . The trio initially pursued joint litigation to protect their interests in the land. However, Reddy allegedly emb...
Post a Comment
Read more